Author: Fabrice

  • CSRD przy ograniczonym budżecie: Raportowanie zrównoważonego rozwoju dla firm, które nie są notowane na giełdzie

    CSRD przy ograniczonym budżecie: Raportowanie zrównoważonego rozwoju dla firm, które nie są notowane na giełdzie

    The Omnibus package took most unlisted companies out of the CSRD. It did not take your biggest customer’s procurement team out of your inbox. Brussels stepped back; the banks and buyers who were always the real requesters stepped forward — now with a legal ceiling on what they can ask.

    Co właściwie zrobił Omnibus

    The timeline, because the press coverage blurred it: the Commission proposed the first Sustainability Omnibus on 26 February 2025. A “stop-the-clock” directive followed in April 2025, deferring the later reporting waves. The Omnibus I directive hit the Official Journal on 26 February 2026, in force from 18 Marzec 2026 (EY; PwC Ireland).

    What changed for you:

    • Scope shrank by roughly 80–85%. Mandatory CSRD reporting now requires both więcej niż 1,000 employees on average oraz net turnover above €450 million (Council/Commission final text, summarised by EY). Listed SMEs were removed from scope entirely. A 50-person company is nowhere near either threshold.
    • A value-chain cap became law. Companies with up to 1,000 employees are “protected undertakings”: large CSRD reporters may not request sustainability information from them beyond what the EU’s voluntary standard contains — and protected undertakings may refuse requests that exceed it (PwC Ireland).
    • The voluntary standard exists. The Commission endorsed EFRAG’s VSME standard via Recommendation (UE) 2025/1710 in July 2025, and adopted the Voluntary Standard via delegated act — Commission Delegated Regulation (UE) 2026/1560, in application since 24 Wrzesień 2026 (KPMG; Fiegenbaum). It is based on the VSME, keeps the two-module structure, and doubles as the value-chain cap.

    Nobody will fine you for not reporting. Somebody will ask anyway — and you now have a defensible limit.

    Kto naprawdę jest w zasięgu

    Not the regulator. Your counterparties. EFRAG’s cost-benefit analysis — a survey of more than 4,400 SMEs across 13 Member States — found nearly 43% of medium-sized enterprises already receive ESG data requests from buyers and lenders, a share expected to approach 100% by 2028 (EFRAG CBA, via Karomia). Banks fold the same data into loan pricing; two large customers means two questionnaires, and the answers rarely transfer.

    The VSME is the answer-once format. Against full ESRS it is dramatically lighter (PwC comparison): mniej więcej 96 data points instead of ~314, a basic module plus an optional comprehensive module instead of 12 standards, no mandatory double materiality assessment, and assurance optional rather than compulsory. Start with the basic module — energy, emissions, workforce, governance — which covers most of what buyers and banks ask. Add the comprehensive module (Scope 3 estimates, climate risks, targets) only when a lender or tender demands it; EFRAG puts the extra cost at roughly double.

    Ile kosztuje pierwszy raport w firmie zatrudniającej 50 osób

    The published numbers, which are more useful than any vendor quote:

    • EFRAG’s cost-benefit analysis (Syntesia/Prometeia, using the EU Standard Cost Model): a small/medium enterprise (20–250 employees) using the basic module faces first-year costs of about €7,500–12,800, mostly staff time, dropping to €3,500–6,000 per year thereafter. Basic plus comprehensive: €17,500–22,800 in year one, €8,500–11,000 recurring.
    • Internal effort for a 20–100 person SME: 40–75 hours spread across finance, HR, operations and management — at a loaded internal rate of €50–80/hour, €2,000–6,000 of staff time (Verdeledger).
    • Consultant day rates: €800–3,500 depending on seniority, with senior CSRD specialists at €1,200–2,500 in the DACH market (CSRD-Experts). A consultant-led first VSME basic-module report runs €5,000–10,000, falling to €2,500–5,000 in later years (EFRAG CBA via CSRD Pro; ESG for Suppliers).
    • Software platforms: €300–3,500 per year depending on size (EFRAG CBA via CSRD Pro).
    • Full ESRS, for contrast: a double materiality assessment alone lists at €10,000–25,000 for an SME, and full implementation at €25,000–75,000 (CSRD-Experts). That is the train you mostly no longer need to catch.

    The honest budget line for a 50-person company doing VSME basic in-house with a light external QA pass: roughly €3,000–6,000 in year one, half that afterwards.

    Pięć źródeł danych, które już posiadasz

    The VSME basic module was designed around data that already exists. Before hiring anyone, collect twelve months of:

    1. Utility bills. Prąd, gas and district-heating invoices for every site give you energy consumption and most of your Scope 1–2 carbon. 2. Print and copier logs. Meter readings and paper purchase orders cover resource use — and typically expose that three machines do 60% tomu. 3. Travel bookings and fuel cards. The booking tool export, matched to the vehicle list, is your transport emissions without a single new form. 4. Waste invoices. Waste contractors bill by stream — paper, packaging, mixed, hazardous. That is the VSME waste disclosure, already itemised. 5. Procurement ledger. Your purchase ledger, categorised, supports the spend-based Scope 3 estimate if you ever add the comprehensive module.

    Assign one coordinator, align the period to your fiscal year, and write nothing until the basic-module data is in one folder.

    Co zachowujesz

    Answer once, not four times: about €7,000 a year.

    >

    A 50-person company fielding three ESG questionnaires a year spends 30–100 hours on them (Verdeledger); EFRAG’s survey work puts the fully-loaded cost of a single request at up to €7,100 (Karomia, citing the EFRAG CBA). At the conservative end — three requests, 30 godziny otwarcia, €80/hour — that is €7,200 a year of duplicated work a single VSME report replaces with “see our report.”

    >

    Starting now, calmly, costs €7,500–12,800 once (EFRAG), then €3,500–6,000 a year. Scrambling in 2027 — when wave-one customers file their first CSRD statements and supplier data requests multiply, at rush rates from senior consultants billing €1,200–2,500 a day — means paying the questionnaire toll oraz the premium. One Belgian manufacturer that started early qualified for an ESG-linked loan 15 bps cheaper — about €3,000 a year. The €7,000 is the number that survives a hostile CFO.

    Źródła

    • KPMG, VSME: A voluntary sustainability reporting option (incl. Sept 2026 adoption update): https://kpmg.com/xx/en/our-insights/ifrg/2025/omnibus-vsme-standard.html
    • PwC Ireland, Voluntary Sustainability Reporting Standard for non-listed SMEs (VSME vs ESRS comparison): https://pwc.ie/services/audit-assurance/insights/vsme-voluntary-sustainability-reporting-standard-non-listed-smes.html
    • EY, EU Sustainability Developments — Omnibus Content Directive in force (Marzec 2026): https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/csrd-technical-resources/documents/ey-gl-eu-sustainability-developments-revised-delegated-act-on-eu-taxonomy-enters-into-force-03-2026.pdf
    • Mayer Brown, European Commission Presents “Omnibus” Simplification Package (Feb 2025): https://mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2025/02/european-commission-presents-omnibus-simplification-package-with-amendments-to-csrd-csddd-cbam-and-taxonomy
    • EFRAG/Syntesia–Prometeia, Cost-Benefit Analysis on the VSME: https://efrag.org/system/files/sites/webpublishing/Project%20Documents/2309261112573240/EFRAG%27s%20Cover%20Letter%20and%20Cost%20Benefit%20Analysis%20on%20VSME.pdf
    • Komisja Europejska, Impact assessment accompanying the revised ESRS delegated act (IMMC SWD(2026) 500): http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d108ba08-76c9-11f1-bf5e-01aa75ed71a1.0001.03/DOC_1
    • CSRD Pro, What Does CSRD Reporting Cost for SMEs in 2026: https://csrdpro.com/en/csrd-reporting-cost-for-smes
    • Verdeledger, Sustainability Reporting Cost and Timeline for SMEs: https://verdeledger.eu/blog/sustainability-reporting-cost-timeline-sme
    • CSRD-Experts, CSRD Consultant Costs 2026 (day rates): https://csrd-experts.com/blog/csrd-consultant-costs
    • ESG for Suppliers, ESG Consultant vs DIY (VSME report fees): https://esgforsuppliers.com/guides/esg-consultant-vs-diy-honest-comparison
    • Karomia, Stop Drowning in ESG Requests (cost-per-request, loan-spread case): https://karomia.eu/blog/stop-drowning-in-esg-requests-one-vsme-report-can-do-it-all
    • Fiegenbaum Solutions, VSME Sustainability Reporting: Basic vs Comprehensive Modules (VS application date, basic-module data list): https://fiegenbaum.solutions/en/blog/vsme-sustainability-reporting-basic-vs-comprehensive-modules

    Następny przeciek do naprawy

    The value-chain cap limits what buyers can ask — not what they will keep asking until you hand them something reusable. Build the answer bank this quarter: one folder, one fiscal year, five data sources, one VSME basic report. When the wave-one customer’s questionnaire lands in January, the right answer is a link, not a fortnight of someone’s life. The policy-and-reporting playbook lives at /category/policy-reporting/.

    —

    Carla Lavigne jest redaktorką działu Green Ops w mycompanyisgreen.org i koleżanką, która przynosi kalkulator na audyt.

  • Audyt odpadów biurowych: Weekendowy przewodnik, który sam się zwraca

    Audyt odpadów biurowych: Weekendowy przewodnik, który sam się zwraca

    Your waste contract is the only line in the office budget that nobody has ever opened. Electricity gets audited, paper gets benchmarked, even the coffee gets compared — but the bin contract renews quietly every year, priced for an office that throws away everything.

    The fix is not a sustainability programme. It is a two-hour audit on a Friday afternoon, one phone call on Monday, and a calculator. Here is the whole procedure, with the real tariffs it should be measured against.

    Ile faktycznie kosztuje podnoszenie śmieci

    Municipal operators in the EU publish their tariffs, which means you never have to guess what a lift should cost — only what yours does. Three published examples, all current:

    • Berlin (BSR, municipal, fee schedule 2025/26): a 1,100-litre residual-waste bin on fortnightly service costs €164.23 per quarter — roughly €25 per lift. Weekly service doubles the fee. The 660-litre bin is €118.58 per quarter. The recyclables bin (Papier, packaging) is fee-free. A 240-litre bio bin is €13.50 per quarter.
    • Dithmarschen district, Niemcy (AWD, commercial price list valid from 1 January 2026): commercial residual waste in a 1,100-litre bin runs €149 per month on weekly service, €102 fortnightly, €80 every four weeks — and an unscheduled extra lift costs €71. Paper collection in the same bin size starts at €13 per month.
    • Dublin (Panda Recycling, pay-by-lift, January 2025): €13.50 per general-waste lift, €3.80 per organic lift, €1.25 per recycling lift, plus a €70 half-yearly service charge.

    The pattern across all three: residual is expensive, recycling is cheap or free, and every organic item in the wrong bin is charged at the residual rate. Your contract may not look like these. That is exactly the point of the audit.

    Co twoje biuro faktycznie wyrzuca

    Three independent datasets bracket the answer:

    • Eurostat puts EU municipal waste at 517 kg per capita in 2024, with biowaste the single largest fraction of reported composition (28.8%), followed by paper and cardboard (13.9%) and plastic (7.5%). Office waste is counted in municipal waste in most member states.
    • Cundall’s audits of UK offices (100–175 kg per person per year, average ~130 kg) znaleziono over half the mass is paper and roughly 30% food.
    • Great Forest compiled 100+ audits of commercial office buildings and found 77% of what offices send to landfill is recyclable: 34% organics, 23% Papier, 19% glass/metal/plastic, with only 23% genuine rubbish.

    So a 50-person office at Cundall’s average generates about 6.5 tonnes a year, of which perhaps 1.5 tonnes is actual trash. The other five tonnes are paper, packaging and food paying residual-bin prices.

    The coffee line is worth its own number. The Deutscher Kaffeeverband puts German consumption at 163 litres per person per year and recommends 7–10 g of grounds per cup. Conservatively — two cups a day, 220 working days, 8 g of grounds — a 50-person office produces roughly 180 kg of wet coffee grounds a year, every one of them currently landfilled inside a black bag, where they sit anaerobically and make methane.

    Protokół weekendowy

    Friday, 4:00 pm (90 Minuty). Collect every bin: under desks, Kuchnia, print corner, reception. On a floor covered with cardboard, sort the contents of three representative bins into five piles — paper, packaging, food and grounds, general, drink containers. Weigh each pile with a luggage scale. That is your composition.

    Friday, 5:30 pm (30 Minuty). Pull the last 12 months of waste invoices. Build one table: bin size × collection frequency × price per lift × annual cost. Note every surcharge — extra lifts, fuel levies, bin rental, “contamination fees”. The surcharge line is where renegotiation money usually hides.

    Monday (one call). Two phone calls, actually. Call your current hauler with the composition table and ask for a re-quote with a smaller residual bin plus free paper/packaging collection and an organic service. Then call one competitor with the same table. Municipal tariffs above are your walk-away price.

    Tydzień 2. Replace under-desk bins with a central sorting station — Great Forest measured recyclables in trash falling from 30% do 7% after exactly this change. Add one bucket under the coffee machine.

    Co zachowujesz

    A 50-person office that sorts properly and re-prices its contract saves roughly €1,500–2,000 a year — about €35 per employee, Powracający.

    >

    The arithmetic: 6.5 tonnes a year at a loose density of ~110 kg/m³ is about 59 m³, or ~54 lifts of a 1,100-litre bin. At a conservative blended residual rate of €35 per lift, the all-in-black-bin baseline is €1,890 a year. After the audit, paper and packaging go out free (BSR charges nothing for them), 1.5 tonnes of true trash needs only ~22 lifts (€770), oraz 1.8 tonnes of organics go to a bio service at ~€600. New total: ~€1,370.

    >

    The honest caveat: the pure bin arithmetic saves ~€500. The bigger number comes from the contract — weekly service becomes fortnightly, the €71 extra-lift surcharges stop, and one competitor’s quote reprices the rest. A 25–30% cut on a five-figure haulage line is what the audit actually buys. That is the number to defend in the budget meeting.

    Nothing here needs a consultant, a sensor or a campaign poster. It needs one Friday and the invoices nobody opened.

    Metodologia

    Tariffs: BSR fee schedule 2025/26 (1,100 l residual €164.23/quarter fortnightly, weekly doubles, recyclables free, bio 240 l €13.50/quarter); AWD commercial price list from 01.01.2026 (1,100 l residual €149/month weekly, €71 per extra lift, paper from €13/month); Panda Dublin pay-by-lift, January 2025. Composition: Eurostat (517 kg/capita 2024; biowaste 28.8%, paper/cardboard 13.9%); Cundall audits via Positive Zero (~130 kg/person/year); Great Forest 100+ office audits (77% divertible). Coffee: Deutscher Kaffeeverband (163 l/person/year, 7–10 g per cup). Model: 50 × 130 kg = 6.5 t at ~110 kg/m³ ≈ 54 × 1,100 l lifts; residual €35/lift blended.

    Źródła

    • Berliner Stadtreinigung (BSR), Gebührenübersicht 2025/26: https://www.bsr.de/gebuehrenuebersicht
    • Berliner Stadtreinigung (BSR), Abfallgebührensatzung 2025/26 (Amtsblatt Nr. 55): https://www.bsr.de/assets/downloads/abfallgebuehrensatzung.pdf
    • Abfallwirtschaft Dithmarschen (AWD), Preisliste Gewerbekunden, gültig ab 01.01.2026: https://www.awd-online.de/fileadmin/media/PDF__s/01_AWD_Preisliste_Gewerbekunden_2026_ansicht.pdf
    • Eurostat, Municipal waste statistics (517 kg per capita, 2024; composition 2023): https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Municipal_waste_statistics
    • Positive Zero / Cundall, CO2e emissions due to office waste (office audit data): https://positivezero.com.au/s/IP-6-CO2e-emissions-due-to-office-waste.pdf
    • Great Forest, Office Waste Management Optimized (100+ commercial office audits): https://greatforest.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/White-Paper-Office-Waste-Mgmt-Optimized.pdf
    • Deutscher Kaffeeverband, Kaffeeland Deutschland facts (163 l per capita, 2024): https://kaffeeverband.de/de/presse/kaffeeland-deutschland-20-tag-des-kaffees-spannende-fakten-zum-lieblingsgetraenk
    • Deutscher Kaffeeverband, Kaffeezubereitung — dosing 7–10 g per cup: https://www.kaffeeverband.de/de/kaffeewissen/kaffeezubereitung
    • Dublin Live, Panda Recycling charge increases (per-lift prices, January 2025): https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/cost-living-ireland-thousands-bin-30879650

    Następny przeciek do naprawy

    The audit tells you what leaves the building; it does not tell you what arrives. Delivery packaging — the corrugate, film and polystyrene your suppliers drop off weekly — is the second half of the same tonnage, and unlike the bins, you can bill it back: a returns-and-reuse clause in the next supplier contract turns your receiving dock into the cheapest recycling stream you have. To jest kolejny artykuł z tej serii: Odpady & Okrągłość.

    —

    Carla Lavigne jest redaktorką działu Green Ops w mycompanyisgreen.org i koleżanką, która przynosi kalkulator na audyt.

  • Zachowaj laptopy biurowe 4 lata: prawdziwy koszt zbyt wczesnej wymiany

    Zachowaj laptopy biurowe 4 lata: prawdziwy koszt zbyt wczesnej wymiany

    Every three years the invoice arrives: fifty laptops out, fifty three-year-old machines to the remarketer. The warranty runs to month 36 oraz “we refresh on a three-year cycle” sounds like good governance. It is also most offices’ biggest carbon decision of the year — and it barely saves money.

    Węgiel jest zużywany zanim otworzysz pudełko

    Every manufacturer’s lifecycle assessment tells the same story: impact is front-loaded into manufacturing.

    • Apple’s MacBook Air 15-inch M4 report: 155 kg CO2e, split 71% production, 25% use, 3% transport, pod 1% end-of-life (Marzec 2025).
    • Company-wide, Apple puts manufacturing at 74% of its footprint (Environmental Responsibility Report, 2019).
    • Dell’s XPS 13 (9340) report: mean 263 kg CO2e, manufacturing 83.4%.
    • Dell’s Latitude E3440 study: 314 kg CO2e, manufacturing roughly 70% — laptops are the exception; for desktops and servers, use dominates.

    Across these reports, 70–85% of a laptop’s lifetime emissions are spent before the first login. Call it three-quarters. One implication matters: spread those ~155–263 kg over more years. Four years instead of three cuts annualized embodied emissions 25% — from 70 kg CO2e per machine-year to 52.5 kg at a conservative 210 kg midpoint. The electricity saved by the newest model is real but small: our measurements put a modern office laptop at ~30 kWh a year, O nas 7 kg CO2e on the EU grid. You cannot out-efficiency a factory.

    The euro math: 3 VS 4 VS 5 lata, 50 machines

    A transparent model for a 50-person office buying €1,650 business-class laptops (ThinkPad T14 / Latitude 7000 class, ex-VAT), electricity at €0.2058/kWh (Eurostat, German business rate, H1 2026):

    Line 3-year cycle 4-year cycle 5-year cycle
    Purchase, net of resale value €1,188 €1,503 (incl. €150 warranty upgrade) €1,752 (incl. €300 warranty upgrades)
    Wsparcie & out-of-warranty repairs €180 €290 €470
    Downtime allowance €45 €70 120 €
    Prąd (30 kWh/yr) €19 €25 €31
    Total per machine €1,432 €1,888 €2,373
    Per machine-year €477 €472 €475

    Residuals are ITAD benchmarks: mniej więcej 28% of purchase price recovered at three years, 18% at four, 12% at five (Hummingbird International), with resale of $150–350 for a three-year-old business laptop falling to $75–200 at four (Altech ITAD). The warranty upgrade is a real quote: Lenovo’s 3-to-4-year Premier Support extension runs €147–244 per machine at Bechtle. Support and downtime step up in years four and five, consistent with Dell’s failure-cost study, which pegs one out-of-warranty repair at $1,425.

    The result is almost embarrassingly flat: the four-year cycle is cheapest, but only by about €5 per machine-year — €260 a year across 50 machines. The argument is what those years do to the other two lines:

    • Capex timing: a 50-seat office buys 16.7 machines a year on a three-year cycle, 12.5 on a four-year cycle. That defers roughly €6,900 of purchasing per year.
    • Carbon: 4.2 fewer machines per year × ~210 kg embodied = ~875 kg CO2e avoided annually, a 25% cut in the fleet’s amortized laptop footprint.

    That is the entire prize, and the three-year cycle throws it away for €5 a machine-year.

    Badania, które mówią o trzech latach — i dlaczego tak mówią

    A May 2026 IDC survey of 735 organizations (sponsored by Qualcomm) found a three-year refresh runs 14% cheaper than five years — $1,993 per PC over five years. A Wipro-for-Dell study of 106 firms reached the same verdict in 2010.

    Look at the drivers: IDC monetizes productivity loss and IT staff time on $70,000–100,000 loaded salaries plus a 15% revenue margin — “user impact” is their fastest-growing line, not hardware or support. If your workloads are Office, browser and video calls, a maintained year-four machine is not losing anyone’s week — and IDC’s own figures show costs compounding hardest in year five. The Wipro study is fifteen years old, from the era of spinning hard drives and 4 GB RAM.

    The failure folklore points the same way. The oft-quoted “one in three laptops fail in three years” comes from SquareTrade’s analysis of 30,000 consumer warranty claims — student machines and dropped MacBooks, not warrantied enterprise fleets. Enterprise hardware with next-business-day support has no cliff at month 36; it has a gradual slope, insurable for €147.

    Co zachowujesz

    Moving 50 laptops from a 3-year to a 4-year refresh saves about €260 a year in hard cost and defers ~€6,900 a year in purchasing — while avoiding ~875 kg CO2e annually, a 25% cut in the fleet’s amortized laptop carbon. The euros are modest; the carbon is the whole point — the cheapest tonne your company will ever not-emmit.

    Two conditions: buy one spec above today’s workload — the four-year cycle fails on under-specced machines, not old ones — and buy the year-four warranty extension at purchase, not after the failure. Thoughtworks moved from three to four years in 2024 on exactly this logic and reported a 34% cut in laptop emissions in the first full year.

    Metodologia

    Wbudowany węgiel: 210 kg CO2e midpoint of Apple’s MacBook Air M4 (155 kg, 71% production) and Dell’s XPS 13 (263 kg, 83.4% manufacturing); Latitude-class machines land higher (314 kg). Price €1,650 ex-VAT; electricity €0.2058/kWh (Eurostat nrg_pc_205, H1 2026) at 30 kWh/year from our 2026 measurements. Residuals 28/18/12% from ITAD benchmarks. Warranty upgrade €150. Support €60/machine/year in-warranty, €110 in year 4, €180 in year 5; downtime €15/25/50. No productivity-loss monetization — that is where the three-year-campaign studies inflate their totals.

    Źródła

    • Apple, MacBook Air 15-inch M4 Product Environmental Report (Marzec 2025): https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/notebooks/M4_MacBook_Air_PER_March2025.pdf
    • Apple, Environmental Responsibility Report 2019: https://images.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Responsibility_Report_2019.pdf
    • Dell, Carbon Footprint Report, XPS 13 9340 (PAIA): https://www.delltechnologies.com/asset/en-nz/products/laptops-and-2-in-1s/technical-support/xps-13-9340-pcf-datasheet.pdf
    • Dell, Carbon Footprint of a Dell Latitude E3440: https://i.dell.com/sites/csdocuments/Corporate_corp-Comm_Documents/en/PCF-WP-E3440.pdf
    • Dell, Keeping Notebooks Past Their Prime (failures and costs): https://i.dell.com/sites/content/business/smb/sb360/en/documents/wp-nb-failures-costs.pdf
    • IDC for Qualcomm, Cost of Aging PCs, three-year refresh study (May 2026): https://www.qualcomm.com/content/dam/qcomm-martech/dm-assets/documents/IDC_Qualcomm-PC-Impact.pdf
    • Wipro for Dell, Using TCO to Determine Optimal PC Lifecycle: https://i.dell.com/sites/content/business/smb/en/Documents/Using-TCO.pdf
    • SquareTrade, Laptop Reliability Study (30,000 laptops): https://www.squaretrade.com/htm/pdf/SquareTrade_laptop_reliability_1109.pdf
    • Hummingbird International, Monetizing Retired IT Assets (residuals by age): https://hummingbirdinternational.net/10-ways-to-tackle-global-waste
    • Altech ITAD, Where Do Refurbished Laptops End Up: https://altechco.com/where-do-refurbished-laptops-end-up-the-full-story
    • Bechtle, Lenovo 3Y Premier to 4Y Premier Support upgrade: https://www.bechtle.com/be/shop/lenovo-3y-premier-to-4y-premier-support–4491376-73–p
    • Foxway, Handprint Report 2023: Laptops (citing EEB: EU-wide 1-year laptop life extension = 1.6 Mt CO2/year by 2030): https://www.foxway.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/handprint-report-laptops-2023-eng.pdf
    • Thoughtworks, A better laptop for the job: https://www.thoughtworks.com/en-gb/insights/microstories/a-better-laptop-for-the-job-lower-emissions-and-costs
    • Eurostat, electricity price statistics (nrg_pc_205), H1 2026: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?tytuł=Electricity_price_statistics

    Następny przeciek do naprawy

    The policy is right; now the machine is the wrong question. Half your office never leaves a desk, and the laptop you hand them costs more and idles hotter than the €599 desktop that would do the same job. Before the next purchase order, rank your fleet by who actually closes the lid: Najbardziej energooszczędne komputery biurowe 2026, Uszeregowane według rzeczywistych kosztów puts measured watts, annual kWh and euro cost against every candidate.

    —

    Carla Lavigne jest redaktorką działu Green Ops w mycompanyisgreen.org i koleżanką, która przynosi kalkulator na audyt.

  • Bezpapierowe w 30 Dni: Praktyczna mapa drogowa biura z rzeczywistymi kosztami

    Bezpapierowe w 30 Dni: Praktyczna mapa drogowa biura z rzeczywistymi kosztami

    “Przejście na bezpapierowe” usually dies in a meeting where nobody can say what paper actually costs. This roadmap fixes that first. Four weeks, five workstreams, and euro figures you can put in front of a CFO without footnotes.

    Dlaczego 30 Dni, and why invoices first

    Paper is a symptom; documents are the disease. And the document with the clearest price tag is the supplier invoice, because researchers have been pricing it for years.

    Ardent Partners’ State of ePayables 2025 (Przegląd 204 AP and finance leaders) puts the all-in cost of processing one invoice at an average of $9.84 — about €8.77 at the ECB rate of 1 Listopad 2026 (0.89095 USD/EUR). Best-in-class teams — the top 20% on cost and cycle time — do it for $2.65 (€2.36). Everyone else averages $12.42 (€11.07). APQC’s benchmark of 1,485 organizations lands lower but tells the same shape: median $5.83 (€5.19), top quartile at or below $2.07, bottom quartile at or above $10.

    Two more Ardent numbers that matter for the roadmap: 49.7% of invoices are still received manually (2024 survey), oraz 21.9% of AP staff time goes to answering supplier inquiries that mostly trace back to paper and PDF chaos. The average invoice sits in the pipeline 8.2 Dni; best-in-class clears it in 2.9 Dni.

    One caution: Ardent and APQC use different samples and definitions — don’t merge their figures. Apply one to your own volume and measure your baseline in week one.

    Tydzień 1: Audit — know your number before you spend a euro

    You cannot claim savings you never measured. Three counts, one week:

    1. Invoice volume. Ciągnij 12 months of incoming supplier invoices from accounting. Split by channel: Papier, PDF attachment, structured electronic. Ardent’s 49.7% manual share is the industry average, not your number. 2. Print volume. Twelve months of meter readings from every device. A machine printing under 2,000 pages a year carries fixed costs that make every page wildly expensive — it should not exist. 3. Touch time. Have three people log minutes per paper invoice for two weeks: print, file, chase approval, hunt for the copy. Ten to fifteen minutes per document is a common observed range — treat it as your working assumption until your own logs say otherwise.

    Deliverable: one page with three numbers and a euro cost per invoice for your office.

    Tydzień 2: Quick wins — no software, no contract

    • Default every printer to duplex, black-and-white, oraz “print on demand.” Mono laser toner runs about 3.5 cents a page brand-name, plus roughly 1–2 cents of paper: Zadzwoń €0.05 a page printed.
    • Kill standing print jobs — auto-forwarded emails, calendar dumps, the print-and-read habit.
    • Flip your top 10 suppliers to email-to-data capture so the highest-volume lane stops being keyed by hand.
    • Put one document retention rule in writing: if it isn’t a contract, invoice or regulated record, it doesn’t get printed.

    These cost nothing and typically take 20–40% of office print off the meters within a month. At €0.05 a page, a 50-person office printing 250,000 pages a year saves €2,500–5,000 on print alone.

    Tydzień 3: E-invoicing — the mandate is the deadline you cannot move

    If you invoice or pay French suppliers, this week is no longer optional:

    • 1 Wrzesień 2026: every VAT-registered company in France must be able to odbierz E-faktury, and large companies and ETIs must emit them through a state-approved platform (PDP).
    • 1 Wrzesień 2027: PME and micro-enterprises must also emit.
    • Na terenie całej UE (ViDA, adoptowana 11 Marzec 2025): structured EN 16931 e-invoicing plus near-real-time digital reporting becomes mandatory for intra-EU B2B transactions on 1 Lipiec 2030 — and since April 2025, member states can mandate domestic e-invoicing without asking Brussels first. Belgium and Poland are already ahead of you.

    The business case is the Ardent gap: paper/PDF-heavy processing costs €8.77–11.07 per invoice against €2.36 in automated best-in-class environments. Structured e-invoices are what close that gap, because they remove keying, cut the 18.4% average exception rate, and shrink the 8.2-day cycle toward 2.9.

    Działania: pick your PDP or accounting-platform route, register, and get your five biggest French suppliers onto structured invoices this month.

    Tydzień 4: Signature and archive — close the last two paper loops

    • Signature. Under French civil code (Sztuka. 1366, ponieważ 2005) and EU eIDAS (Reg. 910/2014), an electronic signature carries the same evidentiary weight as ink when the process is reliable; qualified signatures remove the doubt entirely. Standard e-signature plans run roughly €10–30 per user per month. Move NDAs, purchase orders and supplier onboarding first.
    • Archive. French commercial books must be kept 10 lata (commerce code art. L123-22) and invoices are auditable for up to 6 years for VAT. A compliant electronic archive — one that guarantees integrity and legibility for the retention period — replaces the filing cabinets, the floor space and the shredder. Do this after tydzień 3, so you archive structured data, not scans.

    Co zachowujesz

    A 50-person office: conservatively €16,000 a year, with a defensible ceiling near €32,000.

    >

    Assumption: 5,000 supplier invoices a year (O nas 20 a day — check your week-1 count). At Ardent’s survey average of €8.77 per invoice, you spend about €43,850 a year processing them. Best-in-class processing at €2.36 would cost €11,800 — a gap of €32,050.

    >

    Thirty days does not make you best-in-class, so claim half the gap: €16,000 a year, Powracający. Add €2,500–5,000 of print reduction from week 2 and the first-year number is real money against a budget of a PDP subscription, an e-signature plan and some staff time. Every euro of it traces to a published figure and your own audit.

    Źródła

    • Ardent Partners, State of ePayables 2025 benchmarks ($9.84 average, $2.65 best-in-class, $12.42 all others, 8.2 Dni, 18.4% exceptions, 21.9% inquiry time), via Aequo AP’s sourced benchmark page: https://www.aequoap.com/accounts-payable/cost-per-invoice
    • Ardent Partners, AP Metrics That Matter in 2024 (49.7% manual invoices, $9.87 average): https://storage.googleapis.com/ssl-public-files/998_20246310_ArdentPartnersAPMetricsthatMatterin2024.pdf
    • APQC cost-per-invoice benchmarks (median $5.83, top quartile ≤$2.07, 1,485 organizations, 2018), via Aequo AP: https://www.aequoap.com/research/cost-to-process-an-invoice
    • French government, service-public.fr — e-invoicing obligations and calendar: https://entreprendre.service-public.gouv.fr/vosdroits/F31411
    • Ministère de l’Économie — e-invoicing reform, 1 Wrzesień 2026/2027 deadlines: https://economie.gouv.fr/tout-savoir-sur-la-facturation-electronique-pour-les-entreprises
    • PwC Netherlands — ViDA adopted 11 Marzec 2025, DRR from 1 Lipiec 2030: https://pwc.nl/en/insights-and-publications/tax-news/vat/vidaformallyadopted.html
    • Papercut — print cost per page: https://papercut.com/blog/print_tips/estimating-your-printing-cost-per-page-the-true-print-costs-calculator
    • ECB USD/EUR reference rate, 5 Listopad 2026: https://frankfurter.dev

    Następny przeciek do naprawy

    The roadmap stops new paper from arriving. It does not deal with the paper you already committed to buy — copy paper is still priced 28% above its 2016 level after the 2022 re-basing. The ten-year price record, z paragonami: Ceny papieru, 10 lata: Ile faktycznie płaci teraz twoje biuro.

    —

    Carla Lavigne jest redaktorką działu Green Ops w mycompanyisgreen.org i koleżanką, która przynosi kalkulator na audyt.

  • Domyślnie duplex: Polityka papierowa, która oszczędza więcej niż negocjacje dotyczące tonerów

    Domyślnie duplex: Polityka papierowa, która oszczędza więcej niż negocjacje dotyczące tonerów

    Zapytaj kierownika biura, gdzie idą pieniądze, a on wskaże toner. Widoczne są naboje, Zwiększają fakturę, i wydają się łatwe do negocjacji. Papier jest inny: cicho, Tanio, uporządkowane według palety, Nigdy nie omawiany. Właśnie dlatego najtańsza polityka druku, jaką możesz przyjąć, wcale nie jest negocjacją cenową. To ustawienie domyślne: każde wydruku jest dwustronne, chyba że ktoś świadomie to zmieni.: Każdy duplex przy druku, chyba że ktoś celowo go nadpisa.

    Ile naprawdę kosztuje ream w spóźnieniu 2026

    Sprawdziliśmy aktualne niemieckie oferty porównawcze dla standardowego papieru A4 na listopad 2026. Podłoga jest poniżej trzech euro za 500 arkuszy: Na liście wystawiono pięciopak papierów ekonomicznych 12.99 Euros (0.52 centy za kartkę), Prędkość Inapa tecno przy 2.92 Euros (0.58 centy za kartkę), oraz HP Office CHP110 w 3.16 Euros (0.63 centy za kartkę). Papier marki średniej półki, taki jak Double A Premium, zajmuje się na poziomie 4.72 euro za ream, a sklepy z artykułami biurowymi wymieniają główne ilości mniej więcej pomiędzy 5 oraz 9 Euros. Na arkusz, Realistyczny koszt papieru wynosi mniej więcej 0.5 centy na piętrze do 1 cent przy typowych cenach kontraktowych.

    Matematyka liczenia arkuszy

    Długoletnie szacunki rządu USA, powtarzane w materiałach EPA i ENERGY STAR, to to, czego typowy pracownik biurowy używa 10,000 Arkusze papieru do kopiowania rocznie. Weź biuro 50 osób w takim tempie: 500,000 arkusze corocznie, która jest 1,000 Broje. W biurze HP 3.17 Euro za ream, to znaczy 3,170 Euros rocznie; at 6 Euro za ream będzie 6,000 Euros. Druk dwustronny dzieli arkusze na pół dokumentu, a własne wytyczne EPA dotyczące automatycznego duplexingu wskazują, że osiągalna oszczędność wynosi 30 do 50 procent kosztów zakupu papieru. Na konserwatystę 40 procent, Biuro liczące 50 osób unika 400 Broje, Wartość 1,268 Euro na Euro 3.17 euro na ream lub 2,400 Euro na Euro 6 Euros. Negocjacje dotyczące tonerów rzadko znacząco zmieniają budżet.

    Prawie każde urządzenie już to potrafi

    Ograniczeniem jest sprzęt praktycznie nie w biurze. W przewodniku EPA dotyczącym redukcji działalności gospodarczej, O nas 67 Procent kopiarek jest zdolnych do obsługi dwustronnej, Jednak dwustronna szybkość kopiowania była tylko w okolicach 15 procent. Luka to miejsca i nawyki, Nie maszyny. Dlatego ENERGY STAR wymaga certyfikowanych urządzeń do wysyłki skonfigurowanych do druku dwustronnego: Regulatorzy traktują domyślne dupleksy jako zachowanie wyjściowe, Nie eko-dodatkiem.

    Przeskaluj tę samą matematykę do swojego biura

    Liczba 50 osób to jeden z punktów danych, Nie sufit. Stosując te same założenia, 10-osobowy zespół drukujący 10,000 arkusze używają każdego z nich 100 Mnóstwo dolarów rocznie, O nas 317 Euro na Euro 3.17 Euro na pełen razy, z których praca w duplexie mniej więcej się odzyskuje 127 Euros. Wydział liczący 250 osób zajmuje się 5,000 Broje, O nas 15,850 Euros, z wokół 6,340 Euro do odzyskania. Przy tysiącu pracowników linia odzyskiwalna osiąga co roku sześciocyfrową kwotę w euro. Jeśli Twoje biuro drukuje mniej niż 10 000 arkuszy na osobę, a biura hybrydowe zazwyczaj tak robią, Skaluj je proporcjonalnie; Stosunek między wydatkami na papierze a tym, ile zrób z pracy w duplexie nie zmienia się, tylko jego rozmiar. Ta sama arytmetyka wyjaśnia też, dlaczego oszczędności są niewidoczne w żadnym pojedynczym rachunku, a widoczne w rocznej sumie.

    Linia węglowa, Wykorzystanie opublikowanych czynników

    Model redukcji odpadów EPA przypisuje artykułom unikniętym czynnikiem 4.28 Tony ekwiwalentu CO2 na tonę papieru biurowego. Przykładem pracy agencji: 1,000,000 arkusze zapisane dzięki drukowi dwustronnemu (2,000 Broje, O nas 5 ton papieru) równe 21.4 Tony CO2e unikane każdego roku. Zmniejsz to: the 200,000 Arkusze naszego 50-osobowego biura unika przy 40 procent to mniej więcej 1 tona papieru oraz, w tym samym momencie, wokół 4.3 Ton CO2e, Mniej więcej to, co emituje mały samochód biurowy w ciągu roku. A ratunek zajmuje najsilniejsze miejsce w hierarchii odpadów UE: Prewencja. Dyrektywa ramowa dotycząca odpadów zobowiązuje państwa członkowskie do prowadzenia programów zapobiegania odpadom, A papier unikany jest lepszy niż papier z recyklingu w każdej księgowości, którą możesz robić.

    Jak faktycznie działa egzekwowanie przepisów

    Niewypłacalności przetrwały; instrukcje zanik. Buduj politykę warstwowo, aby nie było potrzeby indywidualnej decyzji:

    • Ustaw druk dwustronny w domyślnych ustawieniach drukowania po stronie serwera w kolejkach druku, a nie tylko na stacjach roboczych., Nie tylko na komputerach stacjonarnych. W Windows są to domyślne wartości druku drukarki na serwerze druku, które wypychają się do każdego dodatkowego połączenia klienta; użytkownicy mogą nadpisywać, ale ścieżka najmniejszego oporu jest dwustronna.
    • Niech będzie to obraz polityki grupowej dla każdego wdrożenia sterownika, Więc laptop z nowym obrazem nie resetuje biura z powrotem do Simplexu.
    • Konfiguruj samą kopiarkę lub urządzenie MFP, aby kopiowanie z walk-up było dwustronne, zamykając drogę, która omija każde ustawienie na pulpicie.
    • Wyjątki dla bramek: Wymagać biznesowego powodu jednostronnego w umowach, Dokumenty lub dokumenty oprawione zewnętrznie, oraz co miesiąc przeglądać kolejkę wyjątków.
    • Gdy urządzenie nie ma duplexera, Dopasowanie jednego lub oznaczenie tej kolejki poza polityką; Kupuj lub wynajmuj tylko mieszkania, które niezawodnie dupleksują.

    Gdy duplex nie ma zastosowania

    Nie każda strona jest równa, a uczciwa tabela zapobiega nadmiernym ingerencjom polityki. Polityka powinna określać, co jest objęte zakresem, a co nie:

    Kategoria druku Decyzja o duplexie Dlaczego
    Wewnętrzne projekty, Dokumenty robocze Duplex, egzekwowane Nigdy nie złożyłem wniosku; Półarkusze nic nie kosztują
    Długie raporty, Polityka, Plecaki treningowe Duplex, egzekwowane Lżejsze, Tańsze, wciąż do wiązania
    Umowy i zgłoszenia wymagające jednostronnych stron Simpleks, Z wyjątkiem Wymóg prawny lub kontrahentyczny
    Zgłoszenia powiązane zewnętrznie Simpleks, Z wyjątkiem Specyfikacje wiązań zakładają jedną stronę
    Materiały pisane podczas spotkań Simpleks, Z wyjątkiem Notatki potrzebują pustej przestrzeni

    Dwa efekty drugiego rzędu należą do przypadku biznesowego, oba pochodzą z wytycznych EPA dotyczących duplexowania. Pierwszy, Papier, którego kupujesz, jest najtańszą częścią papieru, którego używasz: Według danych agencji zużycie papieru biurowego może kosztować 13 do 31 Pomnożona przez cenę zakupu raz po druku, Przechowywanie, Złożenie wniosków, Liczone są opłaty pocztowe i utylizowane, Dlatego każda uniknięta kartka usuwa więcej niż jego część kosztów. Druga, Dokumenty duplex zmniejszają większość tego, co składasz i publikujesz o połowę: Pliki pierścienia mieszczą dwa razy więcej stron, Archiwalne pudełka dzielą się na pół, a poczta wychodząca przekracza krok wagi pocztowej dla niektórych paczek. Nic z tego nie wymaga kupowania czegokolwiek, Zmiana dostawcy lub rozpoczęcie negocjacji, I właśnie o to chodzi: To jedyne zapisywanie druku dostępne przed rozpoczęciem kolejnego kontraktu.

    Zmierz to raz, To przestań się kłócić

    Większość zarządzanych sterowników druku może raportować udział simplex vs duplex w kolejce. Sprawdź punkt wyjścia, zanim cokolwiek zmienisz, ponowne zmierzenie po 30 Dni, oraz śledzić reamy kupowane na pracownika miesięcznie jako pojedynczą liczbę, której nie można manipulować. Jeśli udział w duplexie nie wzrośnie, Problemem jest urządzenie bez duplexera lub kolejki, które ktoś stworzył na zewnątrz, nie opór pracowników. Ustaw wartość domyślną, Zmierz arkusze, i zabierz oszczędności; nie ma czego negocjować. Domyślne połączenie duplex kosztuje jedno popołudnie konfiguracji kolejki i zwraca tyle samo co roku, na zawsze, Niezależnie od tego, czy ktoś pamięta, że ta polityka istniała, czy nie.

    Źródła

  • Obciążenie widmo: ile kosztuje elektronika biurowa podczas snu

    Obciążenie widmo: ile kosztuje elektronika biurowa podczas snu

    W 19:00 the office empties. The lights go off, and the meter keeps ticking — because fifty desks worth of electronics never actually switched off. They are waiting: for a remote signal, a print job, a wake-on-LAN packet, or the next “good morning.”

    That waiting has a name — phantom load — and a long measurement record. Here is what the labs found, what it costs a 50-person office in euros, and what a €25 strip does about it.

    Co faktycznie zmierzyły laboratoria

    These are metered figures, not poster estimates.

    Narodowe Laboratorium Lawrence'a Berkeley (LBNL) has run standby research since the 1990s. In the first whole-home metering study (Ross & Meier), the average house carried 67 W of standby load across 19 devices — between 5% oraz 26% of its annual electricity, with printers among the worst offenders. Berkeley Lab’s standing rule of thumb: one watt left on around the clock burns about 9 kWh per year. Its FAQ puts standby at 5–10% of electricity use in developed countries, and notes commercial buildings are “smaller but still significant.”

    The IEA’s 4E programme compiled 19,000 shop-floor measurements across ten product categories. By 2011, most standby draws sat under 3 W — but networked devices were the exception, with some boxes averaging 25 W. A 2017 UK verification round measured five printers at 0.1–0.3 W: modern printers are cheap sleepers; the old ones and the all-in-ones are not.

    The EU’s REMODECE project, which metered 1,300 homes across Europe, measured an average standby load of about 40 W — 305 kWh per household per year, mniej więcej 11% of household electricity. For offices, the project’s companion estimate put standby on office equipment across the EU-27 at 9.43 TWh per year — at H1 2026 average business prices, close to €1.7 billion a year.

    ADEME, the French environment agency, counts 15 do 50 devices in standby in a typical home at 0.5–3 W each, and its appliance tables price an older espresso machine’s keep-warm at around 100 kWh a year. Which?‘s lab testing puts always-listening smart speakers at up to £6 per device per year in standby — the office equivalent of the conference-room speakerphone that never sleeps. US DOE rounds the phenomenon to 5–10% of building electricity use.

    The 50-person office, line by line

    Take a standard office: 50 desks with a monitor and a desktop, four shared printers, two coffee machines, a water cooler, 60 chargers and docks in drawers, and one snack vending machine. Every watt below is at or under the measured medians above.

    Load Standby draw kWh/rok Cost/year
    50 monitors 50 W (1 W each) 438 €79
    50 desktop PCs 100 W (2 W each) 876 €158
    4 printers/MFDs 12 W (3 W each) 105 €19
    2 coffee machines 10 W (5 W each) 88 €16
    Water cooler 3 W 26 €5
    60 chargers/docks 18 W (0.3 W each) 158 €28
    Speakers/webcams/misc 25 W (0.5 W each) 219 €39
    Vending machine ~69 W average 600 €108
    Razem ~287 W ~2,510 ~€452

    Pricing at €0.18/kWh — Eurostat’s EU average for businesses using 500–2,000 MWh/year, excluding VAT, for January–June 2026 — the sleeping office costs about €452 a year, roughly €9 per desk. In Dublin or Milan, where the same Eurostat table shows €0.25–0.27/kWh, it is closer to €650.

    Sanity check before anyone books a retrofit: €452 is real but modest, and it should be. Berkeley Lab’s own researchers warn the office share is smaller than the residential 5–10%, because office gear is newer and power-managed. Honest framing: phantom load is 1–2% of a typical office electricity bill, not a crisis — a rounding error you can delete for free. The vending machine alone is a quarter of it.

    Co zachowujesz

    ~€452 per year for a 50-person office at the EU average business price (€0.18/kWh) — about €9 per desk. Kill-switching the recoverable loads (everything except the network and the vending machine’s compressor) at a realistic 70% capture returns ~€315 a year. Add the CO₂ the same way: at the EU average grid factor (~310 g/kWh), that is ~0.8 tonnes a year — one economy flight a year, from a habit change.

    Matematyka wyłącznika

    A 50-person office needs roughly 15 switched or smart strips: one per desk cluster, one per printer, one per kitchen counter. At €25 each with real relays, that is a €375 kit, installed in an afternoon by whoever owns the extension leads.

    • Full capture (everything switched every night): €452/year → payback in 10 miesiące.
    • Realistic capture (70% — someone forgets, some boxes must stay up): €316/year → payback in about 14 miesiące, then €316/year free forever after.
    • A building-level controllable circuit with contactors pays back in the same window only if the electrician’s quote stays under €3,000. For one floor, strips win.

    Two rules keep the math honest. Don’t kill what must live: Wi-Fi access points, the alarm, the server, the PBX. And don’t kill the vending machine’s compressor at night — letting refrigeration re-pull temperature can cost more than it saves. Kill its lighting, not its cooling.

    Czym nie warto się przejmować

    A single phone charger left plugged in draws about 0.3 W — €0.48 a year. Chasing individual chargers is theatre. The desk cluster (monitor + PC + dock + speaker) holds 60% of the euros, the vending machine a quarter. Measure one desk cluster with a €20 plug-in watt meter at 21:00 before spending anything: if it reads under 5 W, your power management already works and you can skip this whole article.

    Źródła

    • LBNL, FAQ dotyczące zasilania w trybie rezerwowym (5–10% share, 9 kWh per watt-year, commercial note): https://standby.lbl.gov/frequently-asked-questions
    • Ross & Meier, Whole-House Measurements of Standby Power, LBNL-45967 (67 W average, 5–26%, printers top offenders): https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl-45967.pdf
    • LBNL, Homes that “Leak” Prąd (50 W average, ~5%): https://www2.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/leaking-watts.html
    • IEA-4E DESAM policy brief, 19,000 standby measurements (sub-3 W medians, 25 W boxes): https://iea-4e.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/2013/03/4E_Policy_Brief_MB10.pdf
    • IEA-4E, Standby consumption report UK 2017 (printers at 0.1–0.3 W): https://iea-4e.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/2017/04/Standby_consumption_report_-_UK_version_FINAL.pdf
    • REMODECE / SELINA, EU standby monitoring (40 W and 305 kWh per household; 9.43 TWh EU-27 office standby): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270576891_Standby_and_off-mode_Power_Demand_of_new_Appliances_in_the_Market and https://remodece.isr.uc.pt
    • ADEME, appareils les plus énergivores (device tables, digital = 11% of French electricity): https://agirpourlatransition.ademe.fr/particuliers/economiser/energie/consommation-appareils-menagers
    • Which?, appliance running-cost lab data (smart speaker standby): https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/cutting-your-energy-bills/article/how-much-your-appliances-cost-to-run-a7N937v2SWom
    • US DOE, Shut Down and Unplug (5–10% of building electricity): https://www.energy.gov/articles/save-energy-shut-down-and-unplug-your-electronic-devices
    • Eurostat, business electricity prices H1 2026 (EU average €0.18/kWh, band 500–2,000 MWh, excl. VAT): https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?tytuł=Electricity_price_statistics

    Następny przeciek do naprawy

    The desk cluster is tonight’s job. Tomorrow’s is the machines that never sleep — right-sizing the fleet itself: Zielone IT & Devices →

    —

    Carla Lavigne jest redaktorką działu Green Ops w mycompanyisgreen.org i koleżanką, która przynosi kalkulator na audyt.

  • The 5 ustawienia drukarki obniżające koszty druku 40% (i jak je egzekwować)

    The 5 ustawienia drukarki obniżające koszty druku 40% (i jak je egzekwować)

    The printer on your desk costs less than the ink it drinks. That’s still true in 2026, and it means the money your office burns on printing was never in the hardware — it’s in the defaults. Nobody chose them. They arrived with the driver, and five thousand quiet pages a month later they’ve chosen your budget for you.

    Five defaults are worth changing, each with a number attached — manufacturer documentation, federal print studies, published cartridge yields. Change them and a typical small office lands near a 40% cut in consumables. The math, conservatively, poniżej.

    1. Duplex as default: the single biggest paper lever

    The US EPA’s Facilities Engineering Center is plain about automatic duplexing: two-sided printing saves 30–50% of paper costs, and the true cost of a printed page runs 13 do 31 times the price of the sheet once you count handling, storage and disposal.

    HP ran the experiment on itself: flipping the default to two-sided across its global fleet via the HP Universal Print Driver raised the duplex rate by over 60% immediately, projected 800 tonnes less paper and $7 million-plus saved per year. The pilot’s conclusion — the biggest barrier to duplex was the single-sided default.

    That’s the whole lesson. Users don’t duplex. Defaults duplex.

    2. Grayscale: colour is the most expensive habit in the room

    Marconet’s teardown of an HP Color LaserJet 4600 measured the gap: 2.2 cents per black-and-white page versus 10.3 cents per colour page — a 4.7× premium on what is usually an internal memo with a blue hyperlink.

    Our November 2026 price survey finds the same shape in euros: HP 59A black toner works out at €0.037 per page; a colour-laser page runs roughly three times that. Set grayscale as the driver default and colour becomes the exception you choose, not the accident you inherit.

    3. Draft mode: toner you’ll never miss

    The US Defense Logistics Agency’s “Seven Steps to Lowering Print Costs within 90 Dni” is the bluntest document in office print management. Step three: defaulting to draft quality reduces toner costs by up to 20% “typically without significant decreases in the quality of output pages.” The same document puts toner-efficient fonts at up to 30% less toner than Arial.

    HP documents the mechanism: EconoMode “can use less toner and decrease the cost per page,” with the caveat that HP doesn’t recommend it full-time — toner can outlast the cartridge’s mechanical parts. Farbtoner Lab measured 20–30% less toner per page on a typical office document. Scope it to internal documents.

    4. Margins and pagination: the invisible 5–17%

    The EPA’s paper-usage guidance runs the geometry: with 1-inch margins on all sides, only 63% of the page is print area. W 0.75 inches that rises to 71%; at 0.5 inches, 80%. Penn State’s Green Destiny Council measured what that means in reams: cutting default margins to 0.75″ reduced total paper usage by 4.75% institution-wide. That’s the floor — 0.5″ adds another seven points of print area.

    Pagination belongs in the same setting: print preview on, page ranges instead of whole PDFs. Stop letting a two-paragraph email evict a full sheet.

    5. Cover pages and one-use prints: the 45% bin job

    Xerox behavioural research found office workers throw away 45% of everything they print within 24 godziny otwarcia. Paul Smith, a lab manager at Xerox’s Toronto research centre, timed the fastest casualty: a cover sheet on a shared network printer “only survives maybe 30 seconds — you just recognise your job and then you recycle it.”

    A networked queue doesn’t need a cover sheet. It needs a badge release or a PIN.

    Co zachowujesz

    A 50-person office printing 2,000 pages a month — 24,000 a year, 80% black / 20% colour — spends roughly €1,450 a year on consumables at street prices: €216 in paper (€4.50 a ream) and €1,238 in toner (HP 59A at €0.037 a black page, colour pages at ~3×).

    Setting Sourced figure Annual saving
    Domyślny duplex EPA: 30–50% kosztu papieru (low end taken) €65
    Grayscale default (colour share 20% → 5%) Marconet: colour costs 4.7× mono €263
    Draft mode on internal docs (70%) DLA: do 20% Toner €124
    Margins 0.75″ Penn State: 4.75% Papier €10
    Cover pages / one-use junk (8% of volume) Xerox: 45% binned within a day €88
    Razem €550/year

    That’s 38% of the print bill — call it the honest 40%, because every figure above is the conservative end of its source. On a colour-heavy office, the grayscale line alone doubles.

    Jak je egzekwować

    Defaults decay the moment they depend on users. IT, this is your job description:

    • Windows GPO: deploy the HP Universal Print Driver (or your fleet’s equivalent) z “Print Defaults” locked — duplex, Skala szarości, draft/EconoMode — via Group Policy Preferences or central tooling (HP Web Jetadmin, PaperCut, uniFLOW). HP’s $7M rollout was a driver-level default, not a poster campaign.
    • Lock the dialog, not just the default: where the driver allows it, grey out the settings so reverting takes a deliberate act.
    • Secure release over cover pages: disable cover sheets on the print server queue; move shared devices to badge/PIN release.
    • Template the margins: push a Normal.dotm with 0.75″ margins through GPO or Intune.
    • Odpowiedni rozmiar floty: ENERGY STAR-certified imaging equipment is 40–55% more efficient than standard models, and a typical multifunction device prints about 5% of the time — enforce sleep timers and pull personal desktop printers, which the DLA flags as the highest-cost pages in any building.
    • Audit quarterly: pull page-count and colour-ratio reports from the print server. If colour creeps back above 10%, the default isn’t enforced, it’s suggested.

    Źródła

    • EPA USA, Benefits of Automatic Duplexing — https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2013-09/documents/fec_automatic_duplexing.pdf
    • EPA USA, Reducing Paper and Printer Ink Usage (margins + Penn State case study) — https://epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/paper_usage.pdf
    • HP environmental case study: duplex default, +60% duplex rate, $7M/year — http://www.structuredweb.com/sw/swchannel/CustomerCenter/documents/7933/19910/HP-Environmental_Case_Studies.pdf
    • Marconet, Spojrzenie na koszty tonera do drukarki z perspektywy (2.2¢ vs 10.3¢ per page) — https://marconet.com/blog/bid/346034/putting-printer-toner-costs-in-perspective
    • US Defense Logistics Agency, Seven Steps to Lowering Print Costs within 90 Days — https://www.dla.mil/Portals/104/Documents/DocumentServices/pdf/J6_Best%20Practices%20-%207%20Steps%20to%20Lowering%20Costs_20151013%20.pdf
    • Wsparcie HP, Ustawienia EconoMode dla LaserJet P3010 — https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c01779138
    • Farbtoner Lab, Eco Mode toner test (20–30% measured) — https://www.farbtoner.shop/en/Eco-Mode-in-Printers-Does-It-Really-Save-Toner-Farbtoner-Lab:_:125.html
    • The Guardian on Xerox behavioural research (45% binned within a day; 30-second cover sheets) — https://theguardian.com/money/2007/oct/14/workandcareers.news
    • GWIAZDA ENERGETYCZNA, Multifunction Printers and Zero Carbon/Zero Waste Goals — https://energystar.gov/products/ask-the-experts/multifunction-printers-can-help-reach-zero-carbon-and-zero-waste-goals
    • MyCompanyIsGreen, real cost-per-page survey of 2026 cartridge prices — https://mycompanyisgreen.org/najtańszy-drukarze-koszt-strony/

    Następny przeciek do naprawy

    You’ve stopped the fleet wasting paper and toner by default. The devices still idle at 230 volts around the clock — a multifunction device prints about 5% of the day and heats itself for the other 95%. The plug-level math, including what sleep timers return per device, is in the energy series: Obniż koszty energii.

    Carla Lavigne jest redaktorką działu Green Ops w mycompanyisgreen.org i koleżanką, która przynosi kalkulator na audyt.

  • What is Green Washing ?  are we all doing that ?

    What is Green Washing ? are we all doing that ?

    I had an interesting discussion about the greenwashing, and I didn’t know the word actually. What is that ? it is when you use the green cause to make marketing, when you don’t really think about what you would sustain but what would be the communication benefit about what you do.
    is this bad ? at the end, if the communication motivation still allow to have some good action to save the ressources.

    It’s usually a very dynamic debat with people truely involved in the green activities. One definition which could help you to know if you are not doing Green Washing is :

    You can measure the positive impact, saved ressources than your action is doing. So for exemple , if you communicate than you have a recycling paper policy, and you could tell exactly how much paper you have recycled and you can respect all the process. then you are fine, whatever if you are strong ( on the point of view of some people ) on your communication about it.

    As usual, it’s also good to read a little bit more about the topic on Wikipedia :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwashing

    Do you have yourself some definition of the Green Washing ?